data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd369/fd369eabe23578c23666864e4d9a9e53407afb04" alt="Parallels vs parallels pro"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2561e/2561e5ab794b4a4b369a8942811598fc28f3f209" alt="parallels vs parallels pro parallels vs parallels pro"
- Parallels vs parallels pro how to#
- Parallels vs parallels pro upgrade#
- Parallels vs parallels pro full#
- Parallels vs parallels pro pro#
- Parallels vs parallels pro trial#
Parallels vs parallels pro full#
Launching the virtual machine with a full Windows boot took 17% less time – which in real world terms, means 6-7 seconds faster on a MacBook Pro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d87b/0d87b96589fada49bceb0061858d4f42a1857ebf" alt="parallels vs parallels pro parallels vs parallels pro"
Overall, Parallels Desktop 8 was noticeably faster than Parallels Desktop 7 – and it just felt “snappier” across the board. In particular, the Parallels Desktop experience on a machine with an SSD and plenty of RAM (in our case, the example was the MacBook Air) is a wonderful experience. In most cases, Parallels Desktop 8 is faster. These included: launching the virtual machine with a full Windows boot, resuming a suspended virtual machine, compressing files, File IO, and, of course, graphics. We wanted to see how the virtual machine performed in several areas. The test was performed on OS X “Mountain Lion” 10.8.2 with all the current updates from Apple applied, and Parallels Desktop 7, and Parallels Desktop 8 running Windows 7 with all current updates applied.Īnd, because it can make a difference on the overall performance, we had not only Windows installed, but also Microsoft Office 2010 (something so many users commonly use virtualization for). In addition, given the big differences for SSD drives, we also added in a MacBook Air 13-inch, 1.8GHz Intel GeForce GT 650M with 512MB of GDDR5 memory).
Parallels vs parallels pro pro#
Specifically, the MacBook Pro 15-inch 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, with 4GB of RAM, 500GB 5400RPM hard drive, and dual graphics configuration (Intel HD Graphics 4000 and NVIDIA The test was done on the current model MacBook Pro. This comparison is only about speed, and not about features. We decided to put Parallels Desktop to the test and compare version 8 to version 7, the previous version.
Parallels vs parallels pro upgrade#
One of the most frequent questions we’ve been getting recently is “Should I upgrade to Parallels Desktop 8?” Even though this new version shipped several weeks back, we generally like to wait a bit as the updates for virtualization software that follow a major release often make a difference. But, if you need a great virtualization option, it's my current pick.MacTech Labs puts the new Parallels Desktop to the test to answer this question. The downside is that if you're on a laptop battery, Parallels can drain it pretty quickly. Parallels also offers remote access service called Access (it's subscription-based and optional), which makes it easy to access your virtual machine from anywhere. 3D graphics run more slowly than Boot Camp due to virtualization - after all, when your Mac is booted into a Windows Boot Camp partition, it is, for all intents and purposes, a Windows PC. Boot times are less and 3D graphics run faster. Having said that, I've found that Parallels Desktop 10 works faster on my Mac (a 2013 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro) than VMWare Fusion 7 does. They're always battling for dominance in the Mac virtualization software market. So in many ways, Parallels Desktop and VMWare Fusion play an arm-wrestling game with each other. That makes it easy to open apps and documents and launch Windows without creating a lot of disruption (or even a lot of open extra windows) on your Mac.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5d8f/f5d8f1b84582627600f16c8a849e121ee48f82ad" alt="parallels vs parallels pro parallels vs parallels pro"
Both offer advanced integration with the Mac environment.
Parallels vs parallels pro how to#
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58aa6/58aa63eb2fff68f8686c4ce1c929d25e97deef01" alt="parallels vs parallels pro parallels vs parallels pro"
Frankly it's not nearly as polished or optimized for speed as either Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion, but free is good, and it's good enough to get by in a pinch. If your budget is tight, there's another option too - virtualBox, from Oracle. So this isn't an end-run around the cost of getting Windows or Windows software. You have nothing to lose.īear in mind that you will need a valid Windows 10 license to install any instance of Windows on your Mac same goes for any Windows apps you want to use.
Parallels vs parallels pro trial#
What's more, both vendors make trial versions available for download, so I heartily encourage anyone interested in giving them a try to do so. First of all, let me say that I think either Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion are excellent choices for virtualizing Windows.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd369/fd369eabe23578c23666864e4d9a9e53407afb04" alt="Parallels vs parallels pro"